While artificial intelligence keeps on evolving, nowadays it brings in a new frontier in automation, called agentic AI.
Such intelligent systems, given autonomous decision-making and acting capabilities, have begun altering workflows, redefining operational efficiencies, and, consequently, prompting questions about the future of work.
The promises of agentic AI are unquestionable, yet widespread job loss, urgent ethical issues, and other social concerns begin to grow as it finds greater acceptance.
This article explores what agentic AI is, how it compares to generative AI, and the ethical and workforce challenges it presents.
We’ll also examine agentic AI in the automotive industry, highlight practical agentic AI use cases in the technology industry, and outline how businesses can responsibly integrate these systems.
Before analyzing the impact of this technology, we must first understand what agentic AI is.
Whereas classic rule-based software and generative AI work mostly for content creation of sorts (such as text, image, or code), agentic AI acts.
In a purposeful manner, these AI agents can sense, reason, decide, and act in a digital or physical environment, and they usually do so continuously with very little supervision.
This distinction is rather crucial in the debate of agentic AI versus generative AI. Whereas generative AI such as ChatGPT aids in content creation and is reactive and user-guided, the agentic one is goal-oriented and proactive.
It will not wait for human prompts to do something, from initiating actions to prioritizing tasks and adapting behavior according to outcomes.
This difference in workflows and business processes drastically affects the very notion of doing jobs in the future.
With the ability of agentic AI to duplicate decision-making and automate complex workflows, turbulent times await labor markets.
There have been reports indicating that by 2025, AI may displace up to 300 million jobs worldwide, a staggering transformation of the employment landscape.
The impact is rather differentiated. Sixty percent of jobs could be affected in certain advanced economies compared to just 26% in low-income countries.
This is in-part due to the concentration of white-collar jobs in sectors such as finance, marketing, and operations that are presently being targeted for automation.
In the United States:
Real-world implementations offer a preview. Salesforce’s Agentforce, an embedded AI agent in Slack, automates customer research and lead prioritization. This not only streamlines sales and marketing operations but also reduces the need for junior-level staff.
In the automotive industry, agentic AI is being deployed for predictive maintenance, autonomous driving, robotic assembly, and supply chain optimization, diminishing the role of human technicians and logistics managers.
Alongside job loss concerns, the rise of agentic AI introduces complex ethical dilemmas that organizations and governments must address urgently.
The research shows that only 7% of desk workers were confident in the use of AI tools, and training was absent with respect to working alongside these intelligent systems for 30%.
A lack of preparation creates the digital-bid inside the organizations and raise issues about fairness and informed consent.
AI-driven hiring tools, a common application of agentic systems, have demonstrated inherent bias. Recruitment models have misclassified candidates based on gender, ethnicity, or geographic origin—perpetuating systemic inequalities instead of correcting them.
There is also growing concern about economic inequality. Agentic AI could deepen the wealth gap by consolidating profits among a handful of tech giants, while displacing large swathes of middle-skill workers in administrative, support, and coordination roles.
These trends highlight the urgent need for ethical oversight, especially as companies adopt agentic AI without fully accounting for its societal impact.
In the technology sector, agentic AI is being rapidly integrated across core business functions.
Key agentic AI use cases in the technology industry include:
While these systems improve operational efficiency, they also raise critical questions: Who is accountable for decisions made by autonomous agents? How do we prevent harm if a system behaves unpredictably?
Despite these challenges, experts suggest that businesses can responsibly adopt agentic AI by focusing on human-centered design, policy alignment, and workforce transformation.
More than 20 million workers may transition into new roles related to AI by 2025. Emerging AI ethics jobs and operational roles include:
In many workplaces, agentic AI is not replacing humans—but augmenting them. For example:
This hybrid model enables employees to spend more time on high-value tasks, while AI handles repetitive or time-sensitive operations.
Companies like Slack and Salesforce are advocating for those so-called "ethical guardrails," or comprehensible frameworks addressing explainability, bias detection, and escalation procedures.
Regulatory bodies are drafting standards for agentic AI systems, though much work still remains.
Transparency is a must: an end-user must at least be aware of how and why an AI system chooses to act. The governance of such systems cannot be one of those things that can be shoehorned in later once agentic AI gets stronger—it has to start with design.
GSDC empowers Agentic AI adoption through a globally recognized, vendor-neutral Agentic AI Professional Certification. It equips both technical and non-technical professionals with the skills to apply AI ethically and strategically in real-world workflows.
By bridging AI innovation with business readiness, GSDC supports lifelong learning, upskilling, and effective digital transformation across roles and industries.
If you like this read then make sure to check out our previous blogs: Cracking Onboarding Challenges: Fresher Success Unveiled
Not sure which certification to pursue? Our advisors will help you decide!